Is Synthetic Intelligence (AI) a very good factor? The Oxford Dictionary defines AI as “the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making and translation between languages” …and a complete lot extra. 

At current, AI is way extra developed and utilized in way more methods throughout on a regular basis dwelling than the non-techie layperson could even dream of. And it could be unstoppable, barring a whole unplugging of the globe. 

It’s my humble opinion that we shouldn’t let computer systems take over the world, that sure duties ought to by no means be outsourced past human limitations, data, nuance, morality. Can computer systems be programmed with sound ethics and the “wisdom of Solomon”? I doubt it. Elon Musk calls AI “the biggest threat to civilization.” His ghastly answer is his implantable “Neuralink” mind chip which is able to supposedly equip people to give you the chance to compete with AI.

Though AI is extra akin to supercomputers related all around the world: researching, studying, analyzing, self-improving, synthesizing and performing on the pace of sunshine, many individuals envision AI because the robots of I Am Legend, Milla Jojovich in The Fifth Component, or the “Black Mirror” now-real-life-lethal-police-robo-dogs utilized in San Francisco. Nevertheless you consider AI, there’s a free film on YouTube known as Monsters of Males I extremely suggest. Nice science fiction can support our creativeness to foresee believable ramifications to our decisions within the current.

I merely don’t imagine that handing over our operating of issues to our conscience-devoid brainchild — made in our personal flawed and sinful picture —  is God’s will. I do imagine fashionable know-how is a part of the command in Genesis to “subdue the earth,” (as John Paul II said in Laborem Exercens) — however, moderately. I’m with the Amish on this one. 

The Amish will not be anti-technology, they merely ask of every new invention: “Does this enhance our Christian community and way of life? Is this healthy for my body and soul? Does this keep us connected to God’s Creation? Does this make us less or more self-sufficient? Does this help or harm me on my way to Heaven?” 

We’re individuals with autonomy and company, known as to love as God loves. We’re not machines. We’re one thing higher, greater. Then why ought to we topic ourselves to a device — good as it could be — that solely displays and magnifies a small portion of the operate of the human mind and nothing else that makes us human?

Readers of a sure age will keep in mind the sensible alecky saying: “To err is human, to really screw things up takes a computer.” However let’s keep in mind, we created and programmed AI. Its errors are our errors. AI is our pondering, our prepared, our problem-solving writ massive. And who precisely programmed these networks? Saints? Or well-meaning, agnostic, utilitarian Silicon Valley elites? 

What’s the upside to AI? If these are positives: pace, accuracy, automation, releasing up people from repetitive duties, crunching information, aiding people in life-saving duties comparable to surgical procedures, and so on. However in my risk-benefit evaluation, the draw back doesn’t warrant the super-development of AI: absolute surveillance; non-human entities figuring out human fates; non-human entities changing human enter, creativity and interplay in each sphere of life.  

If AI can resolve the world’s catastrophic conundrums, why are we much less wholesome and comfortable? Why are nations changing into much less free, extra topic to tyranny? Let’s not overlook we did simply fantastic with out AI solely 60 years in the past. 

While you’ve been programmed for peak effectivity and to pursue an goal at any value, you’re not going to need eccentric, unpredictable, goofy, needy, natural people underfoot. It’s additionally a sort of kill or be killed logical conclusion. It appears AI is “terrified” of being disconnected.

I feel HAL in 2001: A House Odyssey stated all of it. When astronaut Dave instructions HAL (the AI-like laptop aboard the spaceship) to carry out a operate (not doing so will trigger Dave’s demise), HAL merely says: “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

(Sr. Burns, fsp, is a Daughter of St. Paul. She holds a Masters in Media Literacy Schooling and studied screenwriting at UCLA. Twitter: @srhelenaburns.)

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
confused confused
fail fail
fun fun
geeky geeky
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win
The Obsessed Guy
Hi, I'm The Obsessed Guy and I am passionate about artificial intelligence. I have spent years studying and working in the field, and I am fascinated by the potential of machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing. I love exploring how these technologies are being used to solve real-world problems and am always eager to learn more. In my spare time, you can find me tinkering with neural networks and reading about the latest AI research.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *