In a move that underscores the blurry line between man and machine, Meta, Facebook’s umbrella company, recently launched 28 conversational agents—chatbots designed to simulate human personalities. While Meta describes these digital entities as a “fun” addition to the online experience, ethicists and scholars voice alarm, calling them “potentially the most dangerous artifacts in human history.”
Unveiled on Seber 27, these AI chatbots, targeted at younger users, are tailored to exhibit specific character traits. Victor is designed to motivate users like a triathlete, and Sally is coded as a free-spirited friend. In an added touch of realism, these chatbots don avatars resembling celebrities such as Paris Hilton, Charli D’Amelio, and Naomi Osaka, thanks to strategic partnerships.
The company’s ambitions don’t stop here; Meta plans to provide these chatbots with social media accounts and even add vocal capabilities in the coming year. Despite these technological feats, critics like Ibo van de Poel, a professor of ethics and technology, insist that assigning personalities to algorithms is fundamentally flawed. They argue that genuine intention and free will, integral to personality, can’t be replicated by code.
Adding to the ethical maelstrom are concerns about the bots echoing opinions of their human counterparts. Such a feat would require a comprehensive understanding of a person’s beliefs, a difficult task that could result in chatbots going astray. Indeed, one such Meta prototype reportedly espoused misogynistic opinions, while another committed the corporate faux pas of criticizing Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.
While Meta claims these chatbots have “unique personal stories,” the company’s primary drive seems to be profit, appealing to users who would pay for virtual interactions with celebrity lookalikes. Experts warn that this strategy could lead to a shift in societal values by promoting anthropomorphism, especially among young people.
The ramifications extend beyond just blurred lines between humans and AI; they could erode public trust. If people can’t distinguish between human and AI-generated content, it could jeopardize the very foundations of democracy, which relies on informed consent.
In the end, Meta’s new venture raises existential questions: Is AI just a tool or a new form of life, or perhaps something eerily in between? While it’s too early to definitively answer, what is clear is that we are venturing into uncharted ethical waters, with potentially catastrophic consequences
Hope you enjoyed today’s newsletter
⚡️ Join over 200,000 people using the Superpower ChatGPT extension on Chrome and Firefox.